Vladislav Zaytsev (matters, p. 3)


 <<<  1  2  3  4  >>>
— » Represented a U.S. claimant in a SCC arbitration against a Ukrainian respondent on a gas supply contract. The case was subsequently settled by the parties;
— » Represented a U.S. claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a Ukrainian respondent on a gas supply contract. The tribunal found for the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay $1.015 million;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a large Georgian factory related to a loan dispute. The tribunal found for the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay over $29 million;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a Swedish respondent on a supply of food products agreement. The respondent paid the debt in the course of arbitration and the case was settled by the parties;
— » Represented a charterer in arbitration under the auspices of the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry with regard to a charter-party dispute. The tribunal found for the charterer;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a BVI respondent on a gas supply contract. The tribunal found for the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay over $4.5 million;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a Russian respondent on construction of looping and bypass pipelines contract. The tribunal found for the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay over $2.7 million;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a U.S. respondent on a gas supply contract. The tribunal found for the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay over $7.9 million;
— » Represented a Russian respondent in an ICAC arbitration against a Swiss claimant on a supply of mazut contract. The claimant requested a tribunal to order a specific performance of the contract. The claim was dismissed in its entirety;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a Ukrainian respondent on a gas supply contract. The case was subsequently settled by the parties;
— » Represented a respondent in arbitration under the auspices of the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry against a claimant on a supply of grain by sea contract;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a respondent on a loan agreement. The tribunal found for the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay over RUB 8 million;
— » Represented a claimant in an ICAC arbitration against a Ukrainian respondent on a gas supply contract. The tribunal found for the claimant and ordered the respondent to pay over $128 thousand;
— » Represented a Russian respondent in an ICAC arbitration against a BVI claimant on a gasoil supply contract. A contentious issue concerned a subsequence of supplies and prices linked thereto;
— » Represented an applicant in Moscow district (commercial) courts set-aside proceedings of an arbitral award rendered under the auspices of the Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. The award was set aside due to procedural irregularities in the course of arbitration;
— » Represented ICAC claimants in Moscow district (commercial) courts set-aside proceedings on motions of ICAC award debtors from Ukraine (3), Switzerland (1), Georgia (1). Debtors’ applications were dismissed and ICAC awards survived;
— » Represented arbitral awards creditors in the recognition proceeding before the respective state courts (singly or in cooperation with the local consultants). Two awards were recognized in Russia; one in the Texas, U.S. (in cooperation with a Texas based law firm) more than ten awards in Ukraine (in cooperation with a Ukrainian law firm), two in Kazakhstan (in cooperation with an independent Kazakh attorney), one in Georgia (in cooperation with a Georgian law firm); one in Moldova (in cooperation with a Moldavian law firm);
— » Represented a company in numerous "corporate-war" litigations before the Russian (commercial) courts of Moscow, Central, Povolzhie, West Siberian and Ural districts on illegal capture (unfriendly takeover) of the company's assets (corporate disputes);
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT rebate dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decision to refuse the claimant's application for the VAT rebate to the amount of over RUB 90 million was declared invalid;
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of an excise tax dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decision to hold the claimant responsible for the breach of excise laws and to collect excise/interest/fines from the claimant to the amount of over RUB 607 million was declared invalid;
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decisions to set-off allegedly outstanding debts against a VAT rebate to the amount of over RUB 12.7 million were declared invalid;
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to pay interest to the amount of RUB 1.5 million for the delay in VAT reimbursement;
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT rebate dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to reimburse the claimant VAT to the amount of RUB 25.43 million from the federal budget;
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of an excise tax dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decision to hold the claimant responsible for the breach of excise laws and to collect excise/interest/fines from the claimant to the amount of over RUB 377 million was declared invalid;
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decisions to set-off allegedly outstanding debts against a VAT rebate to the amount of over RUB 39 million were declared invalid.
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to pay interest to the amount of RUB 3.4 million for the delay in VAT reimbursement;
— » Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT rebate dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to reimburse the claimant VAT to the amount of over RUB 41 million from the federal budget;

<<<  1  2  3  4  >>>


About
Feedback
Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd. represented us in an arbitration against Brazilian supplier of agricultural goods. The arbitration was conducted under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) with the seat in London; the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods applied to the substance of the dispute with subsidiary application of the English law. We are very satisfied with the quality of services provided by Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd. Apart from that matter, this law firm advised us (i) on certain issues of arbitrations under the arbitration rules of the Federation of Oils, Seeds and Fats Associations Ltd (FOSFA) and of the Grain and Feed Trade Association (GAFTA), as well as (ii) on several issues of English law. We would like to express our thanks for a consistently high professional level of services and extraordinary dedication to the client. Reasonable fees charged by the firm for such a high-quality job is of a special note.

full video-feedback
Vladimir Khomyakov
Deputy Head of Legal and Corporate Affairs, Rusagro Group of Companies, Moscow
We would like to thank Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd. for their invaluable services rendered in an arbitration administered by the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). The lawyers carried out an enormous work with a high level of professionalism and patience. The case was resolved in our favour.

full video-feedback
Alina Yakhlakova
Representative of Petrovector Energy Ltd., British Virgin Islands
I would like to thank Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd. for their priceless assistance in an arbitration administered by the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. This case was a very complicated one; I believe it was one of the 10 most difficult cases I participated in in terms of fundamental issues of law which had to be dealt with.

full video-feedback
Maxim Kulkov
Head of Dispute Resolution Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Moscow (now – Managing Partner at Kulkov, Kolotilov and Partners)
I would like to express my gratitude to Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd. for the successful representation of our company in two arbitral proceedings: one was administered by the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and another – by Gazprom arbitration court. In each of these proceedings Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd. showed a competent approach to handling the cases, professionalism and high level of discipline.

full video-feedback
A.Y. Yuriev
Commercial Director, Svarog LLP
Our success in litigations has become possible only due to the job of professionals from Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd.

full video-feedback
Fedor Dryamin
COO, Inform Standart Ltd.


All Testimonials
Overviews
A Brief Overview of the Association of Arbitrators (Southern Africa)
A Brief Overview of the Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (CRICA)
A Brief Overview of the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association (JCAA)

More overviews
Team
  • image-description
  • image-description
Brochures

Download brochures on international arbitration practice of our firm

Subscription
E-mail

Genuine Arbitration Service Ltd.'s Profile: Legal services for the representation of clients in international commercial arbitration, including those administered by ICAC, ICC, LCIA, SCC | Legal services in cases relating to the recognition of international arbitral awards in Russia and abroad | Legal services in cases relating to the challenge of international arbitral awards in Russia and abroad | Legal services for taxpayers during tax audits | Legal services connected to the preparation of objections to a tax audit report | Legal services for the preparation of an appeal petition in response to a resolution on the imposition of sanctions for the commitment of a tax offence | Legal services relating to the representation of taxpayers’ interests in tax disputes before Russian State courts of all instances | Legal services relating to the representation of taxpayers’ interests in the course of enforcement proceedings | Legal services relating to the representation of clients before Russian State courts in disputes with other regulatory authorities | Legal services in civil and corporate disputes before Russian State courts | Legal services relating to the representation of clients in domestic arbitration in Russia as well as in cases of enforcement and challenge of domestic arbitral awards before Russian state courts

© 2011-2023 G. A. S. LIMITED
We would like to stress that the present website is only for information purposes and under no circumstances might be interpreted as containing an offer of any type as determined by Russian or any other applicable laws. If you wish to obtain exact information regarding our fees, please call us or send a request from the Contacts page. The content of this website reflects personal opinions of its authors and their understanding of a particular legal issue. Therefore, it cannot form the basis for decision-making of any matter. Please seek the proper legal advice.