Vladislav Zaytsev (matters, p. 4)

	<<< 1 2 3 4
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of an excise tax dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decision to hold the claimant responsible for the breach of excise laws and to collect excise/interest/fines from the claimant to the amount of over RUB 647 million was declared invalid;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decisions to set-off allegedly outstanding debts against a VAT rebate to the amount of over RUB 10.3 million were declared invalid;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to pay interest to the amount of RUB 12.4 million for the delay in VAT reimbursement;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT rebate dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to reimburse the claimant VAT to the amount of RUB 25.49 million from the federal budget;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of an excise tax dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decision to hold the claimant responsible for the breach of excise laws and to collect excise/interest/fines from the claimant to the amount of over RUB 429 million was declared invalid;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decisions to set-off allegedly outstanding debts against a VAT rebate to the amount of over RUB 2.8 million were declared invalid;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to pay interest to the amount of RUB 43.1 million for the delay in VAT reimbursement;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of an excise tax dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decision to hold the claimant responsible for the breach of excise laws and to collect excise/interest/fines from the claimant to the amount of over RUB 337 million was declared invalid;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office's decisions to set-off allegedly outstanding debts against a VAT rebate to the amount of over RUB 400 million were declared invalid;
— »	Represented a large Russian petrochemical company in Moscow district (commercial) courts litigation of a VAT related dispute against Interregional Tax Office No. 1 for the largest taxpayers. The tax office was ordered to pay interest to the amount of RUB 1.03 million for the delay in VAT reimbursement;
— »	Represented a respondent in a Moscow state (commercial) court litigation against the Moscow Government (claimant) on a lease agreement dispute. The court dismissed the claim.
	<<< 1 2 3 4

E-mail