Matters

Some representative matters our lawyers have been involved in are listed below:

— »	Representing a large Russian agricultural company in an arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) with the seat in London against a Brazilian supplier of soya beans; the dispute was governed (substantive law) by the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods with a subsidiary application of English law;
— »	Representing an oil trading company in an arbitration under the Arbitration Rules of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) with the seat in London against a Singaporean buyer; the dispute was governed (substantive law) by English law and related to the quality of oil products delivered to Mongolia;
— »	Advising a UAE based company on London-seated arbitration under GAFTA Arbitration Rules against a grain trader in relation to the alleged breach of a FOB sale contract governed by English law;
— »	Advising a Russian company on English law issues and on an arbitration clause of the agreement for pipeline inspection surveys at a Russian dry section and shore approach (Nord Stream project);
— »	Advising a large Russian metal-trading company on jurisdictional issues of a CIETAC arbitration seated in Beijing in relation to a multi-contract dispute with a Chinese metal supplier;
— »	Recognition of an ICAC (International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry) award in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas;
— »	Advising a Russian company on an arbitration agreement with a large foreign oil company subjecting disputes to English law (substantive one) and referring them to arbitration under the Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC);
— »	Advising a Russian company on several issues of arbitrations under the Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC);
— »	Advising a Russian company on issues of arbitrations under the Arbitration Rules of the Dubai International Arbitration Centre and under the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Rules;
— »	Advising a large Russian developer and manufacturer of energy systems in a dispute against a Finnish company subject to ICC arbitration concerning the contract of energy equipment sale;
— »	Representing a Russian company in an ICAC arbitration against a U.S. respondent in connection with a contract on a geological and geophysical survey for the construction of the Black Sea oil export terminal;
— »	Representing a large Russian engineering group in Moscow district commercial (arbitrazh) court litigations against a U.S. subsidiary in a dispute related to a software development contract;
— »	Advising a large Russian food factory in a dispute subject to arbitration under the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration against a Dutch company and its Italian subsidiary in connection with a supply of equipment contract;
— »	Advising a Russian company on a contract with a UK group of companies on personnel and contractors supply for the maintenance of the Russian company's ship and for survey services;
— »	Advising a large Russian construction group in a dispute subject to arbitration under the Rules of Arbitration of Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC) against an Italian company in connection with a supply of building equipment contract;
— »	Representing a Russian company in Moscow commercial (arbitrazh) court litigation against a reseller of a large Chinese engineering group concerning the breach of a sale contract;
— »	Representing a Russian company in an ICAC arbitration against an Icelandic defendant concerning a contract on navigation and geodesic services for the operation of an underwater vehicle in the Baltic Sea;
— »	Representing a large German group in an ICAC arbitration against a Russian claimant relating to the issuance of bank guarantees;
— »	Advising an Italian company in an ICC arbitration against a Russian factory relating to a supply of equipment contract;
—»	Advising a large Maltese bank in a dispute subject to LCIA arbitration against a Russian bank concerning a shareholder agreement;
— »	Advising a large Russian construction company in a dispute subject to ICC arbitration against an international hotel group in connection with the construction of a luxury hotel in Moscow;
— »	Advising a large Russian state company in a dispute against a contractor (subject to litigation in Russian commercial (arbitrazh) courts) related to the construction of a large sports complex;
— »	Advising a Finnish logistic company regarding a potential Russian commercial (arbitrazh) court litigation against one of the Russian largest insurers in connection with an insurable event;
— »	Advising a large Russian company in connection with a claim brought by a number of individuals before a High Court of Justice of England and Wales against an owner of the Russian company;
— »	Advising a consortium of the largest Russian banks and drafting of an arbitration agreement (with the consolidation and joinder provisions therein) between the banks, a borrower and the Russian Federation in connection with the PPP-agreement;
— »	Advising a Cypriot company on the enforceability in Russia of a Cypriot state court judgment on provisional measures against Russian entities and individuals;
— »	Advising a large inter-state bank in a Russian commercial (arbitrazh) court litigation against an Armenian debtor;
— »	Advising a German investment holding in a Russian commercial (arbitrazh) court litigation against Russian Federal Antimonopoly Agency regarding the validity of the regulation issued by the Moscow Government;
— »	Advising a large German bank on the issues relating to a trans-border flow of personal data of Russian individuals in connection with an investigation conducted by financial regulators.
— »	Advising one of the largest Russian banks on the arbitration rules of a domestic arbitration institute, drafting comments and amendments thereto.

E-mail